Rövid leírás:
In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government’s support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of transitional justice options (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II.
Több
Hosszú leírás:
In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government’s support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II.
This book challenges the „legalist” paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory–„prudentialism”–which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials’ normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.
Kaufman presents his cases in a highly systematic manner, with tight overall organization… Kaufman provides much useful insight… In evaluating the prudentialism and legalism models as ways to explain the United States’ actions in the four primary cases, [Kaufman’s] prudentialism emerges as a clear winner. Kaufman convincingly demonstrates that the United States in each [case] was open to multiple options and motivated by geo-political and other non-legal considerations.
Több
Tartalomjegyzék:
List of Figures and Tables
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Citations
Glossary
Actors
Chapter I: Introduction
Chapter II: Overview of Transitional Justice Options and
the United States Role in Transitional Justice
Chapter III: Competing Theories of United States Policy on Transitional Justice:
Legalism Versus Prudentialism
Chapter IV: The United States Role in Transitional Justice for Germany
Chapter V: The United States Role in Transitional Justice for Japan
Chapter VI: The United States Role in Transitional Justice for
Libya, Iraq, and the Former Yugoslavia
Chapter VII: The United States Role in Transitional Justice for Rwanda
Chapter VIII: Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Afterword
Index
